Prioritizing zoonotic diseases in Ethiopia using a one health approach
G. Pieracci, Emily; J. Hall, Aron; Gharpure, Radhika; Haile, Abraham; Walelign, Elias; Deressa, Asefa; Bahiru, Getahun; Kibebe, Meron; Walke, Henry; Belay, Ermias
Date:
2016-12-15
Organizations Affiliated to the Authors:
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
Epidemic Intelligence Service, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Ethiopian Ministry of Livestock and Fishery Resources, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Ethiopian Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Status:
Open Access
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2016.09.001
Abstract:
Background: Ethiopia has the second largest human population in Africa and the largest livestock population on
the continent. About 80% of Ethiopians are dependent on agriculture and have direct contact with livestock or
other domestic animals. As a result, the country is vulnerable to the spread of zoonotic diseases. As the first
step of the country's engagement in the Global Health Security Agenda, a zoonotic disease prioritization work shop was held to identify significant zoonotic diseases of mutual concern for animal and human health agencies.
Methods: A semi-quantitative tool developed by the US CDC was used for prioritization of zoonotic diseases.
Workshop participants representing human, animal, and environmental health ministries were selected as
core decision-making participants. Over 300 articles describing the zoonotic diseases considered at the workshop
were reviewed for disease specific information on prevalence, morbidity, mortality, and DALYs for Ethiopia or the
East Africa region.
Committee members individually ranked the importance of each criterion to generate a final group weight for
each criterion.
Results: Forty-three zoonotic diseases were evaluated. Criteria selected in order of importance were: 1)severity of
disease in humans, 2)proportion of human disease attributed to animal exposure, 3)burden of animal disease,
4)availability of interventions, and 5)existing inter-sectoral collaboration. Based on the results from the decision
tree analysis and subsequent discussion, participants identified the following five priority zoonotic diseases: ra bies, anthrax, brucellosis, leptospirosis, and echinococcosis.
Discussion: Multi-sectoral collaborations strengthen disease surveillance system development in humans and an imals, enhance laboratory capacity, and support implementation of prevention and control strategies. To facili tate this, the creation of a One Health-focused Zoonotic Disease Unit is recommended. Enhancement of public
health and veterinary laboratories, joint outbreak and surveillance activities, and intersectoral linkages created
to tackle the prioritized zoonotic diseases will undoubtedly prepare the country to effectively address newly
emerging zoonotic diseases.
Show full item record