Institutional Repository

Assessment of External Quality Assurance Scheme Participation Level, on Salmonella and Shigella Species

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author A. Derra, Firehiwot
dc.contributor.author H. Mariam, Bisrat
dc.contributor.author Biza, Tekilil
dc.contributor.author Legesse, Tesfaye
dc.contributor.author Muzeyin, Redwan
dc.contributor.author Girma, Samson
dc.contributor.author Beyene, Yosef
dc.contributor.author Gonfa, Almaz
dc.contributor.author Ayana, Gonfa
dc.contributor.author Lemma, Eshetu
dc.date.accessioned 2023-01-02T14:33:40Z
dc.date.available 2023-01-02T14:33:40Z
dc.date.issued 2019-02-28
dc.identifier.uri http://ephispace.ephi.gov.et/xmlui/handle/123456789/520
dc.description.abstract Background: External Quality Assurance Scheme (EQAS) is the system which allows every laboratory to compare its overall performance with other internal and external existing laboratories, working in similar disciplines. Significant improvements were reported in different laboratories and countries after attending one or more of such programs. The project objective was to assess EQAS participation level in Salmonella and Shigella species that had been processed for six years under WHO-AFRO GSS EQAS program. Methodology: Samples received for Salmonella and Shigella species, as well as Campylobacter and other unknown enteric pathogens identification were directly inoculated to the suitable and selective media according to the type of organisms. Serogroups were reported using terms according to Kauffmann-White-Le Minor procedures. For antimicrobial susceptibility testing, drug diffusion method and CLSI interpretation guideline was used. Results: From the overall participation (2008-2013), serogrouping results were correctly reported as 62/ 71 (87%). None of the deviations was recorded for Shigella species. Participation for Campylobacter species was only twice per six years, in 2009 and 2010; the results of agreement with the expected values were ½ (50%) and 2/2 (100%) respectively. In line with this, the antimicrobial susceptibility participation was correctly reported as 320/356 (89.9%). Conclusion: Even though everyone has gained knowledge and awareness about the benefits of EQAS by default, its acceptance and implementation in developing countries are less communicated and exercised. The final recommendation will be that all higher officials and policymakers in the field have to give attention to it and allocate adequate budget on a continuous basis. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher CrossMark en_US
dc.subject SEROGROUPING en_US
dc.subject SEROTYPING en_US
dc.subject ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTIN en_US
dc.title Assessment of External Quality Assurance Scheme Participation Level, on Salmonella and Shigella Species en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
ep.contributor.affiliation Ethiopian Public Health Institute en_US
ep.contributor.affiliation Department of Food Science and Nutrition Research en_US
ep.identifier.status Open Access en_US
ep.identifier.doi DOI: 10.2174/1874285801913010055 en_US
ep.journal The Open Microbiology Journal en_US
ep.volume 13 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account